Richard Dawkins: An atheist's call to arms
Uploaded by: TEDtalksDirector
Video Description:
http://www.ted.com Biologist Richard Dawkins makes a case for "thinking the improbable" by looking at how the human frame of reference limits our understanding of the universe.
TEDTalks is a daily video podcast of the best talks and performances from the TED Conference, where the world's leading thinkers and doers are invited to give the talk of their lives in 18 minutes -- including speakers such as Jill Bolte Taylor, Sir Ken Robinson, Hans Rosling, Al Gore and Arthur Benjamin. TED stands for Technology, Entertainment, and Design, and TEDTalks cover these topics as well as science, business, politics and the arts. Watch the Top 10 TEDTalks on TED.com, at
http://www.ted.com/index.php/talks/top10
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
![]() |
||
Tags for this video : "Richard atoms Dawkins" Delusion God gravity middle-world science space-time Talks TED TEDTalks
Find more videos in the : "Tech"category
See more videos uploaded by : TEDtalksDirector
Related Videos
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:
















Most of your response is nonsensical whitenoise. But what I'm taking you to say is that Dawkins doesn't make scientific claims about the lack of existence of god, so he hasn't achieved his aim.
Science deals with the natural world of physical objects and laws. And I take it you want him to do that?
Is god a physical being? If he is, then he is mortal, finite, not omnipotent.
Or is god metaphysically outside the universe?
___
In other words Dawkins HASN'T PROVED that God doesn't exist and he FAILS TO SATISFY those same standards which atheists demand of Christians full stop.
You are the plaintiff and Dawkins is the defense. Even if Dawkins doesn't say anything, you still have not come even close to proving the positive case that there is a god and how you know.
Dawkins can just sit back, but he still mounts a powerful argument against god which you have never read.
Absence of evidence is evidence of absence.
I'm an atheist and I support evolution. My cards are on the table. You?
Don't be so hurt because you don't have anything to refute his arguments
___
I'm not offended and I wouldn't be even if Dawkins had any arguments which he hasn't got and I've already shown this.
That's because this video isn't about god or atheism. It's about why we can't intuitively understand the worlds of the very small, large, and fast.
it has absolutely nothing to do with "An atheist's call to arms"
Concerning Dawkins: can you give me any example of argument for non-existence of anything? Non-existence is not to be proved, as the saying (from the circle of Warsaw-Lvov School) goes. One can only proove that some entity is improbable or contradictory in itself, ergo it cannot exist. In our universe existence of God is highly improbable, ergo we can assume with 99% certainty that he is not up there. Heavens are empty.
But its nothing but a speculation. I have seen secular societies, where common folks unable to perform deep reflection are irreligious, but they see no reason to start behaving badly, only because they dont believe in spy-camera in heaven. It is a fact, crime rate is very low in eg. secular Finland or Denmark. Sam Harris' puts it clearly in Letter to a Christian Nation
The problem for Northern Ireland was a poletical problem,Indian and Pakistan Land problem and the same can be said about Palestinian and Israelis.
North Korea and South Korea,Veitnam,Cambodia,Colombia Farc Rebels,Tamel Tiger of Sri Lanka this are the few countries who went to war for their ideology, Most of them where Marxist rebels.
We know what Marxism ideology is athiesm.
Get your fact together before you jump.