Ayn Rand
Uploaded by: Equality72521
Video Description:
Brief clip of Ayn Rand
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
![]() |
||
Tags for this video : Atlas Ayn Fountainhead Galt Intellectual John New Objectivism Rand Shrugged
Find more videos in the : "People"category
See more videos uploaded by : Equality72521
Related Videos
| Ayn Rand on racism | Ayn Rand (1905-1982) | Ayn Rand sobre dios |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
| Ayn Rand Mike Wallace Interview 1959 part 1 | Atlas Shrugged | AYN RAND's message to the GOP CANDIDATES |
![]() | ![]() | ![]() |
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:
















you can't discover the
syntax to condescend.
"What are dose?" asked the attendant.
"They're called tees," replied Tiger.
"Well, what on god's earth are dey for?" inquired the attendant.
"They're for resting my balls on when I'm driving," said Tiger.
"Lardtunderin!" said the Newf, "Ford tinks of everything!"
independence movement in 1949.
you tell a tiger woods joke that's
already all over the net. you are a
viking, bye[boy]; the icy island is
you. who doesn't condescend in
vinland? the talking down to alien
tongues, has expressed the mood
in newfi syntax since leif erikson. i
say lucky bloody you.
ayn's inquire, but require.
not me, it is language
speaking, vinny. i'm
a scriptor see roland
barthes, "death of the
author".
as the degree in which you can
feel tim's words are born from
out of his mind, you make him
author; you give him authority
over his words that---you read.
that is going too far.
discourse of its own that is
evolutionary, knight must
slay author, in order to set
in to re-write-(read)-a text
in a similar, more accurate
way.
I'm a pretentious authority who's going too far?! Who necessarily wants to be more accurate, anyway? That can be a blunder, also--the interpreters of the interpreters of the interpreters can go so far as to make it alien to the original thinker, no?
use language structure falsely to make them
so, he commits an intellectual misdemeanor.
in no way does his action reflect on ayn.
verbalize a predicate that is rather
different from it; it's a rule inherent
in the english language. in peikoff
the fact that actual as in object
verbalize a predicate that is rather
different from it; it's a rule inherent
in the english language. in peikoff
the fact that actual "a's " in object
integrity of ayn, as she got older. i do not
think he did. peikoff had to know that in
law of identity, a is a. he ignored the fact
that symbolic "a" has no actual referents
in the real world he says objectivism is to
come to terms with. furthermore there is
a subject-predicate form and the verb is
problematic as the basis of his thesis. in
go back to russia
give him the fudiciary responsibility
and a duty to conduct her affairs. a
court gave her due process, which
was a duty; ayn is not repugnant to
duty.