Pervez Musharraf: The fall of a dictator
Uploaded by: TheRealNews
Video Description:
More at http://therealnews.com/c.php?c=080601YT
Pakistan's president refuses to resign, while opponents discuss impeachment
![]() |
||
|
|
|
|
![]() |
||
Tags for this video : dictator impeachment musharraf pakistan pervez therealnews
Find more videos in the : "News"category
See more videos uploaded by : TheRealNews
Related Videos
Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Tell a friend:
















I agree with you on few things i.e
previous political governments were corrupt
but it doesn't give the right to have dictatorship(Musharaf). which was corrupt as well.
Solution is democracy. If it doesn't work then again democracy.......and again democracy(even so called democracy).
I think time will tell "who is right and who is wrong"
As i said PPP is beneficiary of NRO that is why Musharaf is still there.
when I say PPP had corruption cases, means its leaders had corruption cases.
Still the worker and the voter of PPP is anti-mush.
Its just the matter of time "PPP has to do what people want". I know zardari will try to delay it as long as he could, but the same time it is hurting him i.e decrease in his popularity. Zardari lacks decision making strength.
what is happening media has created a false hype on judges issue + there is hard core support for judges from nawaz supporters (maybe 15 percent)..ppp gets under pressure because of media drama
Ever since i have noticed that judges issue is fading fast. This issue doesnt have morality behind it and thus it will fail.
Nawaz is promoting it because of his agenda against Musharraf while choodary is doing it for personal reasons as he himself is a former pco judge..InshAllah both will fail in their agnedas
i think you missed one zero at the end
I again say "I am not supporter of Nawaz"
"The lawyers Movement" is the movement agianist falsehood and illegal acts commited by Musharaf. Which he himself accept it. ;)
Do you accept it? simply "NO"
Untill people of that particular country elects "ABC".
Musharaf came into power by force(not democratically) no matter he is good or bad. However, he is as bad as previous politicians.
"judges has to be restored there is no second option"
I accept feudal system is affecting it badly.
I am against that feudal system
but the point I want to make is that " does it give the right to have dictatorship(Musharaf)"
If someone forcefully occupy your or mine house and start running it the way he want. Even if people of that house are more prosperous, more liberal or more wealthy under his rule, doesn't prove his occupation valid.
In Musharraf's case it was not his fault but the fault of Nawaz Sharif who was PM at that time. He tried to reomve army chief while he was "in air". Army took over without Musharraf even knowing and threw him out. the situaion was so bad at that time that people distributed sweets on nawaz's removal.
Difference betwen your view and my view is ideal vs practical.
- he improved the economy
- coducted a fair election in which his enemies won
- retired from the army
now not everything happened ideally in his tenure but let me tell you nnothing is ideal..he did the best as one could
because nawaz was corrupt.
But when you see the larger picture "Musharaf is corrupt as well"
I don't know what actually happened, even you can only speculate.
Even if I agree with you for the sake of argument then
According to constitution primeminister has the right to remove chief of army staff.
"WHO BROKE THE LAW?"